US Leftists Equate Speaking to Russian Officials with Treason
Friday, 03 March 2017

As the struggle in the US between team Trump and its numerous critics intensifies, Russia has been upgraded in the media eye from a vaguely hostile nation to a diabolical power that corrupts any US official by mere contact.

Depicting President Trump as a traitor and a Russian pawn is now months in the making. It rapidly evolved from the chuckled jokes about ‘Siberian candidate’ during the campaign to the now-infamous ‘golden shower’ dossier given validity by CNN after his surprise win. And Trump’s emotional denial of Russia links as “fake news” only made him look guilty in the eyes of critics.

Guilt by association with Russia has cost the president’s team not only reputation, but also allies. The latest target for the blame campaign is Trump’s pick for attorney-general, Jeff Sessions, who stands accused of failing to disclose his meetings with Kislyak during confirmation hearings. The AG denied any wrongdoing, though he admitted that he should have chosen his word more carefully. Democrats say that this amounts to perjury, a charge that nearly cost a certain Democrat president impeachment.

 Earlier Michael Flynn had to resign as national security adviser less than a month after taking the position. He stepped down over allegedly misleading Vice-President Mike Pence about his phone calls with Russian Ambassador to the USA Sergey Kislyak. Media reports alleged that Flynn discussed anti-Russian sanctions imposed by the outgoing President Barack Obama with the Russian diplomat.

And during the run for the oval office then-campaign manager for Trump, Paul Manafort, resigned after being accused of receiving kickback payments from the ousted Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich – a figure widely described as being pro-Russian in the Western media.

The accusations were based on a Ukrainian investigation into the former leader’s alleged corruption and propped by an MP, who leaked information about it to the media. Some media reports claim the information was false and deliberately leaked to hurt the Trump campaign.

Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and now a senior adviser, may have not testified before lawmakers about contacts with Kislyak. But apparently the short meeting in December briefly mentioned by the New Yorker in its 13,000-word cover story was considered by the New York Times and others to be newsworthy enough to dig deeper.

There are other promising candidates for the same tactics, like Carter Page, former Trump energy adviser, who met Kislyak the sidelines of the GOP convention last July and allegedly other top Russian officials. Or Michael Cohen, Trump’s personal lawyer, who was accused of meeting with the Russians during a secret trip to the Czech Republic – even though he says he had never been to the Eastern European country.

And there is State Secretary Rex Tillerson, who received one of the highest Russian civilian awards from the hands of President Vladimir Putin himself.

Reluctance to disclose any Russian connection would now be understandable for Trump’s people. Apparently, for many politicians and journalists, meeting a Russian ambassador is suspicious at best, and treasonous at worst – regardless of circumstances.

Ironically, Kislyak’s newly-won image of a shadowy spymaster does not sit well with his former opposite number in Moscow, Michael McFaul, who is far from being in the Trump camp.

 



Widget is loading comments...


Latest News